菜单
Admiralty paper charts here to stay – a little while longer!

News / / London

The UK Hydrographic Office (UKHO) announced in February 2023 that its planned timetable for withdrawing the production of paper charts would be extended beyond the originally anticipated deadline of 2026 in response to user feedback. It is now likely that a paper chart service will be provided until at least 2030.

The background

In July 2022, following consultation with the Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) and other national user groups, the UKHO announced its intention to stop producing its portfolio of ADMIRALTY Standard Nautical Charts (SNCs) and Thematic Charts by late 2026.

This phased transition from paper chart production to digital products and services was in response to the fact that there has been a decline in demand for paper charts (reportedly down from 80% of sales in 2018 to just 16% in 2021), driven in part by the SOLAS-mandated transition to ECDIS (Electronic Chart Display and Information System) and by the growing recognition of the benefits of digital products and services. The expectation was that the ADMIRALTY Maritime Data Solutions digital navigation portfolio could be updated in near real-time, greatly enhancing safety of life at sea.  

The proposed 2026 deadline was, however, dependent on having the right digital alternatives and technology in place, as well as complying with any regulatory requirements. The UKHO also acknowledged the importance of helping users who might have logistical or digital barriers to adopting digital navigation to make the switch, particularly as the UKHO is the Primary Charting Agency for 63 coastal states and territories. 

The UKHO contemplated phasing out in the first instance charts where demand was low and maintenance was high. It indicated that larger-scale charts would probably be removed first as the locations they covered typically received fewer individual vessel visits and the charts themselves often needed the most updates.

The UKHO’s decision reflects a similar initiative from the NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), which produces paper charts for the US (and many other countries) and which decided in 2019 to phase out paper nautical chart production by January 2025. The NOAA aimed to improve the quality of its electronic chart products and to provide wider scale coverage. Similarly, the Australian Hydrographic Office decided in 2020 to rationalize the Australian paper chart portfolio and concentrate instead on new editions of ENCs (Electronic Navigation Charts).

Consultation

This sunsetting process was admittedly going to have a significant impact on users across the marine, naval and leisure sectors. It would be a real challenge for mariners who had placed their trust in ADMIRALTY paper charts over the years to go digital. Hence the comprehensive and ongoing consultation process with key stakeholders and user groups.

These consultations have already made clear to the UKHO that more time is required to address the needs of specific users who do not yet have viable alternatives to paper chart products. Among other things, the original timetable was thought to be too tight because of a lack of MCA/UKHO approved ECDIS systems. The MCA has been asked to approve electronic charts and display systems as an alternative to Admiralty paper charts and has indicated that it will try to approve chart plotters and similar for recreational use before paper charts are phased out.

Significantly also, SOLAS-compliant ECDIS is used in large commercial shipping but is inappropriate for smaller commercial vessels such as fishing vessels which nonetheless need access to official charts. MCA coded vessels, for example charter or sailing boats, are also required to carry paper charts as a back-up. Mini-ECDIS for smaller vessels is one proposal being discussed, but still needs to be approved and regulated within the industry before it can be regarded as an effective solution.

The key concern is that some users might be left behind with no viable alternatives to paper charts when they are phased out. As a result, the deadline has been extended to allow the UKHO, in collaboration with the IMO and the IHO (International Hydrographic Organization) to move forward at a more measured pace.

Comment

Notwithstanding the delay in completing this paper to digital transition, the UKHO remains committed to a digital future. However, it intends to achieve digitalization without compromising navigational safety and while prioritizing user needs.

Without doubt, ECIDS can significantly enhance safe navigation where it is used correctly. Most large commercial vessels have already adopted a digital platform that makes it easier and quicker to access and update ENCs. These ENCs then interface with other navigational equipment such as AIS (Automatic Identification System) and ARPA (automatic radar plotting aid).

However, those who are still using paper charts for navigation will need to prepare themselves and their vessels for digital-based navigation. The installation of compliant equipment onboard and the training of relevant crew remains key even before 2030.

Finally, it should be kept in mind that there are other providers of paper charts in the market. Nonetheless, the UKHO’s decision to stop printing paper charts after having done so for 223 years is a clear sign of the times.

Vernon Sewell

Vernon Sewell Partner

Reema Shour

Reema Shour Professional Support Lawyer

Related sectors:

相关新闻和市场洞悉

洞察力 / Court of Appeal confirms one-year time bar applies to mis-delivery after discharge

31-05-2023 / 航运

The Court of Appeal has held that the Hague-Visby Rules one-year time bar applied to the Claimant bank’s claim under the bills of lading for mis-delivery after discharge. As a result, the claim was out of time. Read our article, by William Chetwood, Reema Shour and Sharon Msiza, for a discussion of the decision.

Court of Appeal confirms one-year time bar applies to mis-delivery after discharge

洞察力 / How to approach remoteness of damage in multi-contract commodities dispute

24-05-2023 / 航运

In this commodities dispute, the Court has found that the arbitral appeal tribunal had misdirected itself on whether the claimant’s losses were too remote to be recoverable. In their article, Joanna Steele and Reema Shour discuss why the Court came to this conclusion.

How to approach remoteness of damage in multi-contract commodities dispute

洞察力 / Supreme Court dismisses attempt to treat one-off oil spill as a continuing nuisance

15-05-2023 / 航运

The Supreme Court has dismissed an argument that an oil spill emanating from the sea constituted a continuing nuisance and provided the claimants with a continuing cause of action for so long as the oil remained on their land. The oil spill was a one-off event and the cause of action accrued and was complete once the claimants’ land had been affected by the oil. Read our article, by Chris Kidd, Sophie Forsyth and Reema Shour.

Supreme Court dismisses attempt to treat one-off oil spill as a continuing nuisance

洞察力 / Bill of lading in hands of charterer when it ceases to be charterer: document of title or mere receipt?

10-05-2023 / 航运

The Court of Appeal has considered the status of a bill of lading in the hands of charterer after it ceases to be a charterer. Is it a document of title or a mere receipt? Our article, by Jamila Khan, Iain Preston and Reema Shour, analyses the decision.

Bill of lading in hands of charterer when it ceases to be charterer: document of title or mere receipt?

新闻 / KSA Special Economic Zones (SEZs)

04-05-2023 / 商品与贸易, 能源及基础设施, 酒店和休闲娱乐业, 航运, 科技、媒体与电信

KSA has been actively pursuing economic diversitication for investors to do business in the Kingdom. The first Special Economic Zone has now been established, with special commercial regulations.

KSA Special Economic Zones (SEZs)

新闻 / Court finds there was no binding arbitration agreement between parties

27-04-2023 / 航运

Court finds there was no binding arbitration agreement between parties. Emirates Shipping Line DMCEST v. Gold Star Line Ltd [2023] EWHC 880 (Comm) The underlying contract in this dispute was a 2018 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) governing the operation of a container shipping line. The 2018 MOU contained an LMAA arbitration clause.

Court finds there was no binding arbitration agreement between parties