菜单
Serious Fraud Office awards bribery compensation for Nigerian infrastructure

News / / London

On 21 February 2022, the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) announced that a UK-Nigeria Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) had been signed. The MOU sets out the pathway for the transfer of £210,610 compensation obtained by the SFO through the Amec Foster Wheeler Limited (Amec) Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) to the people of Nigeria.

We previously reported on the DPA entered into between the SFO and Amec relating to the use of corrupt agents in the oil and gas sector. The timing of the agreement was particularly significant, as it came on the tenth anniversary of the Bribery Act 2010 and was the tenth DPA entered into by the SFO. As part of the DPA, we reported that Amec had agreed to pay a financial penalty to authorities in the UK, US and Brazil, including compensation to the people of Nigeria.

The compensation payment announced will provide suitable recompense to the people of Nigeria in relation to what Lord Justice Edis determined to be a “direct” loss tax revenue, which was evaded by the use of bribes paid by Amec to Nigerian officials.

The funds shall be used by the Federal Government of Nigeria exclusively for financing three infrastructure projects, namely: (i) Lagos to Ibadan Expressway; (ii) Abuja to Kano Road; and (iii) the Second Niger Bridge.

On the MOU, Lisa Osofsky, SFO Director stated that:

“Bribery and corruption not only stifle real economic growth and free trade, they also damage democracy and therefore risk the security of all our countries.”

Comment

It is unusual for an SFO award of compensation to have been made to overseas victims of corruption. This is only the second time that an SFO DPA has included compensation for foreign victims of corruption, with the first delivering compensation to the Government of Tanzania after a 2015 DPA with Standard Bank.

Without a doubt, energy companies operate globally across commercially and politically challenging countries, with their actions having a real impact on that country's democracy and security risk. It seems likely that despite this being the first DPA against an energy company, similar action and compensation measures could be put in place against other corporates operating in the high-risk sector, benefiting overseas victims of corruption.

Colette Kelly

Colette Kelly Partner, Criminal and Regulatory Solicitor

Waled Salih

Waled Salih Associate

相关新闻和市场洞悉

洞察力 / High Court dismisses ClientEarth’s climate claim against Shell’s directors

02-06-2023 / 能源及基础设施

In ClientEarth v Shell Plc and others [2023] EWHC 1137 (Ch) the High Court (“Court) dismissed a claim by ClientEarth requesting the Court to determine whether it has established a prima facie case to proceed with its substantive application for permission to continue with a derivative claim against Shell Plc. In this article we summarise the Court’s consideration of the claims relating to the derivative action, the establishment of a prima facie case and the alleged breach of various statutory duties.

High Court dismisses ClientEarth’s climate claim against Shell’s directors

新闻 / KSA Special Economic Zones (SEZs)

04-05-2023 / 商品与贸易, 能源及基础设施, 酒店和休闲娱乐业, 航运, 科技、媒体与电信

KSA has been actively pursuing economic diversitication for investors to do business in the Kingdom. The first Special Economic Zone has now been established, with special commercial regulations.

KSA Special Economic Zones (SEZs)

新闻 / International Maritime Organisation grants ZESTAs provisional Consultative Status

08-12-2022 / 能源及基础设施, 航运

Ince is proud to share that ZESTAs has been granted International Maritime Organisation (IMO) provisional Consultative Status by the IMO Council.

International Maritime Organisation grants ZESTAs provisional Consultative Status

洞察力 / Countdown to COP27: recent developments

04-11-2022 / 能源及基础设施, 保险

As we get ready for COP27, we've prepared a summary some of the key developments relating to climate and environmental policies over the last few weeks.

Countdown to COP27: recent developments

新闻 / High Court rules on interpretation of termination for convenience clause

02-11-2022 / 能源及基础设施

Optimares S.p.A. vs. Qatar Airways Group Q.C.S.C 2022 WL 06175341 (2022) A termination ‘for convenience’ clause generally allows the cancellation of a contract without fault in circumstances where performance is no longer required or the terminating party finds, at its will, that the agreement should be abandoned.

High Court rules on interpretation of termination for convenience clause